4. Financial Resources and Management

Faculty orientation deck · draft / consultation marks
50score (Autonomous)
6/4metrics (Autonomous)
Inputcategory

Criterion 4

Criterion 4 | Financial Resources and Management

Understanding the metrics · Preparing the institution

Meaning • Documents • Responsibilities • Measurement
6 baseline metrics + 0 supplementary topics

Orientation to the proposed ten-attribute reform framework. Consultation/draft marks are not final official scoring rules.

Faculty orientation edition • 23 October 2026

Metric 4.1 | Capital Income

20 shared with Revenue Income

Explain funds received for long-term institutional capacity, including infrastructure and equipment. Classify receipts consistently with the institution's audited accounts.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • CA-certified audited statements.
  • Online MIS – Office software report, Cash book photocopy,
  • grant/contribution/loan sanction documents.
  • certified capital-receipt ledger extracts.

Who is responsible?

  • Finance Officer/Accounts.
  • management.
  • authorised auditor.

The amount received towards Capital –

  • Government grants
  • Management contributions
  • Loans
  • Endowments, etc.

Capital Income | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

Capital income is paired with capital expenditure : capital income ÷ capital expenditure. Preserve both underlying amounts.

Draft weightage / source maximum

20 shared with Revenue Income

Consultation metric 4.1: capital income/expenditure ratio

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Illustration only: capital income 60 lakh ÷ capital expenditure 50 lakh = 1.2.

A ratio above 1 does not automatically mean full marks.

Metric 4.2 | Revenue Income

20 shared with Capital Income

Explain recurring operational income such as fees, grants and other eligible receipts. Distinguish recognised income from cash movement.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • CA-certified income statement.
  • fee/grant/other income registers.
  • certified revenue-income ledger extracts.

Who is responsible?

  • Finance Officer/Accounts.
  • relevant grant and fee offices.
  • authorised auditor.

Amount received from multiple sources like -

  • Fees
  • R&D grants
  • Salary Grants
  • Alumni contribution
  • Consultancy
  • Endowments
  • Scholarships, etc.

Revenue Income | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

Revenue income is paired with revenue expenditure : revenue income ÷ revenue expenditure.

Draft weightage / source maximum

20 shared with Capital Income

Consultation metric 4.2: revenue income/expenditure ratio

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Illustration only: revenue income 120 lakh ÷ revenue expenditure 100 lakh = 1.2.

A ratio is a financial indicator; official score conversion remains unverified.

Metric 4.3 | Capital Expenditure

No separate allocation; shared with Revenue Expenditure 10

Explain spending on long-term assets and infrastructure. Separate completed expenditure, outstanding commitments and capitalisation.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • CA-certified capital expenditure extracts.
  • purchase/work orders and invoices.
  • fixed-asset register.

Who is responsible?

  • Finance Officer and Estate/Purchase Office.
  • management.
  • authorised auditor.

Capital Expenditure

Amount spent on various infrastructure like –

  • Instructional building
  • Academic infrastructure including library, hostels, residences,amenities, payment of rentals

Capital Expenditure | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

This is the expenditure component of the capital ratio. Do not assign it a second independent copy of the paired metric's marks.

Draft weightage / source maximum

No separate allocation; shared with Revenue Expenditure 10

Consultation metric 4.1: paired with Capital Income

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Orientation exercise: use real institutional example and show the primary record, the supporting evidence and the relevant approval or review.

Academic YearCapital: Instructional Building—New ConstructionCapital: Academic Infrastructure (Library, Hostels, Residences, Amenities)—New ConstructionCapital: Academic Infrastructure—On RentRevenue: SalariesRevenue: MaintenanceRevenue: AdministrationRevenue: Scholarships and Related AssistanceRevenue: ElectricityRevenue: Transport and TARevenue: Career Guidance and Skill ProgrammesRevenue: Employee BenefitsRevenue: Extracurricular and Co-curricular ActivitiesRevenue: Other Expenditure

Metric 4.4 | Revenue Expenditure

No separate allocation; shared with 10

Explain recurring spending on salaries, maintenance, administration, student support and other operational heads. Use audited classifications.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • CA-certified expenditure statement.
  • supporting ledgers/vouchers.
  • approved budget and variance review.

Who is responsible?

  • Finance Officer/Accounts.
  • administrative and departmental budget holders.
  • authorised auditor.

Revenue Expenditure

Amount spent on various heads like –

  • Salaries
  • Maintenance
  • Administration
  • Scholarships & assistance
  • Electricity
  • Transport
  • Career Guidance and Skilling
  • Employee benefits
  • Extracurricular and co-curricular activities, etc

Revenue Expenditure | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

This is the expenditure component of the revenue ratio. Do not duplicate the paired metric's marks.

Draft weightage / source maximum

No separate allocation; shared with 10

Consultation metric 4.2: paired with Revenue Income

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Orientation exercise: use real institutional example and show the primary record, the supporting evidence and the relevant approval or review.

Metric 4.5 | Sustainability and Growth

10 marks

Explain the institution's ability to support its commitments over time through a corpus, prudent investment, diversified income and financial planning.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • Audited corpus/investment statements.
  • approved finance policy and budget.
  • financial plan and governing-body review.

Who is responsible?

  • Management and Finance Committee.
  • Finance Officer.
  • Principal.

Strategies for financial sustainability and growth:

  • Corpus created
  • Diversification of Investments
  • Plans for increasing capital and revenue income
  • Decentralized budgeting

Sustainability and Growth | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

Discuss corpus and investment strategies supported by records. Forecasts are not realised income; no verified minimum corpus threshold is supplied.

Draft weightage / source maximum

10 marks

Consultation metric 4.3

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Orientation exercise: use real institutional example and show the primary record, the supporting evidence and the relevant approval or review.

Metric 4.6 | Financial Controls and Risk Management

10 marks

Show how authorisation, audit and risk review protect institutional resources and lead to corrective action.

Documents to prepare and maintain

  • Internal and statutory audit reports.
  • Audited income & expenditure statementcertified by CA
  • finance/control policy.
  • risk register and audit action-taken report.

Who is responsible?

  • Finance Committee and Finance Officer.
  • internal/external auditors.
  • management.

Mechanisms of financial control are in place:

  • Internal audits
  • External/statutory audits
  • Risk Management approaches

Financial Controls and Risk Management | measurement, weightage and interpretation

How the metric is understood or measured

Show the control, finding, action and closure. An audit certificate alone does not demonstrate resolution of audit observations.

Draft weightage / source maximum

10 marks

Consultation metric 4.4

Not a verified final allocation or score-conversion rule.

Strategic planning & Discussion

Orientation exercise: use real institutional example and show the primary record, the supporting evidence and the relevant approval or review.

Weightage reference

  • Capital Income20 shared with Revenue Income Capital Expenditure.
  • Revenue Income20 shared with Capital Income.
  • Capital ExpenditureNo separate allocation; 10 shares with Revenue Expenditure.
  • Revenue ExpenditureNo separate allocation; 10 shares with Capital Expenditure.
  • Sustainability and Growth10 marks.
  • Financial Controls and Risk Management10 marks.

4. Financial Resources & Management

Input

Inputs - Financial Resources & Management (50/50/50)

Process
  • Seed money for teachers, students and researchers
  • Support for conferences, workshops, Seminars, equipment, research etc. to students, teachers and researchers
  • Total Amount spent on developing facilities, library, e-resources, labs, training teachers and staff for undertaking outreach activities
  • Amount spent on salary of teaching and non-teaching staff
  • Expenditure on infrastructure augmentation
  • Amount received in donation and CSR funds
  • Revenue generated from outreach activities
  • Utilized amount on library, labs, workshops, other expenditure, salary of teaching and non-teaching staff, maintenance of infrastructure, consumables, Seminars/Workshops/ Conferences, each value given separately for each of the last 3 financial years
Outcome
  • Detailed overview of the financial health and existing capabilities of the institution, Judgement

for expansion of the institutes

Faculty preparation checklist

Prepare the evidence

  • Use approved, dated and signed academic/administrative records.
  • Prepare a concise explanation supported by the relevant primary records.
  • State the period, cohort, unit and counting method for numerical claims.
  • Use source-specified periods only where confirmed; verify the final applicable window.

Coordinate responsibility

  • Criteria coordinator consolidates the criterion; departments supply subject records.
  • HoDs verify academic claims; relevant offices verify finance, HR, exams and admissions.
  • Academic Council/Board of Studies approvals support curriculum decisions.
  • Protect personal data and use anonymised summaries for sensitive records.
  • Review and finalisation by IQAC

Orientation discussion and immediate institutional actions

Questions for faculty and departments

  • Which existing activity demonstrates this criterion most convincingly?.
  • Which claim currently lacks an approved document or primary record?.
  • Where are counts inconsistent between departments and central offices?.
  • Which improvement needs an academic or administrative decision?.

Actions after the orientation

  • Nominate criterion coordinator and metric-level faculty/office leads.
  • Prepare a document inventory and identify genuine gaps.
  • Correct the academic/administrative practice—not just the report wording.
  • Ask IQAC to confirm the applicable framework, periods and scoring source before submission.